Bruce Wlazelek
-
The Basics
-
Bruce on Patch
-
More Stuff
Recently
-
Where were the concerns about budget when the new High ...
-by Bruce Wlazelek
-
Those in uniform deserve this law and better. My only ...
-by Bruce Wlazelek
-
It seems that the most sucessful companies are not those ...
-by Bruce Wlazelek
-
Why should anyone be given authority without ...
Pa. House Gives Police More...
-by Bruce Wlazelek
-
The Upper Macungie Dunkin' Donuts shown is actually in ...
-by Bruce Wlazelek
-
Good observations. Facebook can't really count the ...
Facebook Won't Feed You in ...
-by Bruce Wlazelek
-
I guess you don't understand a conservation area. The ...
-by Bruce Wlazelek
-
Bruce Wlazelek:
Upper Macungie has currently preserved 5 square miles of open space. Mr. Bieber should try to base his opinions on facts.
The Board
Bruce Wlazelek
6:26 pm on Friday, March 18, 2011
I guess you don't understand a conservation area. The land is prohibited from being developed by a covenant that runs with the land in perpetuity. Most of this land was suitable for development but was preserved by permitted development on smaller lots in exchange for the dedication of the land. These areas are removed from land that can be developed without using tax dollars. Much of that land is currently being leased to farmers. There are also environmentally sensitive areas that are being preserved.
Speaking of talking a good game, my fact checking indicates that you are a member of the Lehigh County Authority Board which seeks to expand public water which would permit more development. It also appears that you earn your living by testing land for on-site sewage disposal so that more farmland can be cut-up and developed.
Scott Bieber
11:38 am on Friday, March 18, 2011
Mr. Wlazelek, I did check the facts : Upper Macungie's definition of land preservation on its web site is a prime example of what I mean by talking a good line. It includes 1275 acres of conservation security areas, which is land that can be developed and is not preserved at all. It includes 973 acres of land that was preserved with perpetual easements by the county farmland preservation program without one dime of help from Upper Mac. It includes 620 acres of recreational land, which I don't consider to be "preserved" land in the same sense as preserving a wide open farmfield. But I will give you the benefit of that doubt on that one. But the 1275 acres of security area can no way be considered preserved and the township did not preserve the 973 acrees of county-preserved farmland. Subtracting these two categories from the total leaves 1263 acres, or TWO SQUARE MILES of what the township claims it has preserved. Also, taking credit for floodplains and wetlands as preserved land is not proper because the township's land development regulations already prevent that kind of environmentally sensitive land from being developed. When I speak of land preservation, I mean preserving with deed restrictions land that could otherwise be developed. Period.