.

Will Right-To-Work Movement Come to Pa.?

Gov. Tom Corbett said the Pennsylvania legislature lacks the will to pass right-to-work laws.

By Eric Boehm | PA Independent

HARRISBURG — On the surface, Pennsylvania looks like it could be the next front in the ongoing battle between Republicans and big labor that flared up in Michigan this week as lawmakers there approved so-called “right-to-work” legislation.

The Keystone State, like Michigan – and Indiana and Ohio, where similar battles have gone down — has a Republican governor and a Republican-controlled Legislature.  Like those other states, it has a long history of powerful labor unions.

But all is quiet on the labor front in Pennsylvania, at least for right now.  And Gov. Tom Corbett indicated this week that he does not plan on changing that.

During an appearance on the Dom Giordano radio show on WPHT-AM in Philadelphia on Monday, Corbett said Pennsylvania lacks “the will” to pass right-to-work legislation and indicated it was not a top priority for him as the Legislature gears up for a new session in January.

Kevin Harley, the governor’s spokesman, told PA Independent that Corbett supports right-to-work in theory and would sign the bill into law if it made it to his desk.

However, Harley said, the governor is taking a practical approach because the right-to-work legislation is unlikely to make it through the Legislature.

“What makes it different is that the Michigan Legislature actually passed it,” Harley said. “(Corbett) doesn’t think it would pass here.”

He may have a point.  Right-to-work legislation has been introduced in both chambers of the General Assembly for the past several years, but went nowhere.

During the recently completed 2011-12 session, for example, fewer than 50 of the 253 members of the General Assembly signed on to various right-to-work bills introduced in the state House and state Senate.

In short, right-to-work laws free workers from the requirement to join unions in certain professions.  They also prevent unions from requiring members to pay dues to the union.  Since those dues form the backbone of unions’ financing for legal and political activities, the result is a weakened labor movement in state with right-to-work laws on the books.

In Pennsylvania, about 15 percent of all workers are unionized, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, but the unions are widely regarded as the most powerful political force in state politics.

Rick Bloomingdale, president of the Pennsylvania AFL-CIO, said Friday the union would fight right-to-work legislation “with every breath we have,” if it ever was brought up for a vote.

Bloomingdale went on to explain the key to union power in Pennsylvania.  Rather than aligning itself with one political party, he said, the unions in the Keystone State have a broader reach.

“We’ve never considered ourselves a party,” he said. “We consider ourselves a union, and we work with people on both sides of the aisle.”

Working with people on both sides of the aisle means helping out when it comes time to campaign.

According to research from the Citizens Alliance of Pennsylvania, a nonprofit that works to elect conservative Republicans at the state level, unions in Pennsylvania made more than $1.5 million in political contributions during 2012.

As expected, most of the union money flows to Democrats, but Republicans – particularly the ones in key leadership positions – got more than $80,000 from Pennsylvania unions during the past year.

Leo Knepper, executive director of CAP, said all that money buys considerable influence — and politicians are unlikely to change until that does.

“For a long time, the first thought the members of the General Assembly had about legislation was ‘what will the unions do if I vote for this?’” Knepper said. “Until they reflexively start to ask ‘what will taxpayers and job creators do if I vote against this?’ things won’t change.”

Perhaps worth noting, Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder was lukewarm on right-to-work for most of his first two years in office.

In an interview this week with MSNBCSnyder said he was motivated to pursue right-to-work after the unions in Michigan tried to get collective-bargaining rights enshrined in the state constitution via a ballot initiative in November.

That measure failed, but the labor unrest stirred up by the proposal was enough to spur Snyder to action.

Back in Pennsylvania, some on the right say Corbett is looking at the picture the wrong way.

Instead of saying he would sign a bill when it comes to his desk, they believe Corbett should be actively pushing for his agenda – an agenda that should include right-to-work legislation.

“If he thinks it’s a good idea, he should be out there supporting it. When you’re the governor, you’re the boss,” said Bruce Castor, a Montgomery County Commissioner who is considering a primary challenge to Corbett in 2014.

Staberdearth December 23, 2012 at 11:39 AM
The right to work movement disingenuously frames the issue by begging the question. Sure it is a person's right to join a union. However, to badger them by coercing of dues that typically find their way into the coffers of far left causes is not and should not be a part of that argument. It is abjectly hypocritical to appeal to freedom and democracy, then demand that someone follow YOUR union rules to fund YOUR UNION LEADERS. Where is the freedom of choice? It simply isn't there. Even the card check debate is sullied by union lies and misrepresentation. It's OK to have secret ballots for all elections...except for union ones? What utter nonsense and bullschitte!
logansteele December 23, 2012 at 02:40 PM
I have to agree. I think that unions have outlived their usefulness and though I don't wish to detract from the good that was done in the past for workers, the unions now are just a big business themselves and not always an employee friendly one. I think PA can deal with some of the worst union abuses by encouraging private and alternative schools, closing down the state store system and taking a hard stand regarding legacy costs. Much of our tax dollar goes to specific union employees and their family members rather than to the common good. We can find non union work or patronize non union businesses for less expensive goods and services but we HAVE to pay taxes.
Staberdearth December 23, 2012 at 04:26 PM
My family was all union. However, the way that unions have become contorted for the left's direct gains, mostly the DNC, has got to go! It has become a hornet's nest for far left zealots. Not the union members per se, the union leaders where the adjective "THUG" flows freely attached to those positions. Coercing members in direct violation of what freedom and liberty stands for in the United States (or did...) is the typical domain of the far left zealot who will stop at nothing for their wayward ends which always justify the means in their corrupt and hypocritical minds.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something