.

What's Wrong With Nostalgia? Plenty

Social historian Stephanie Coontz talks about how selective memory hurts current debates.

It was about halfway through her lecture on the downside of nostalgia that social historian Stephanie Coontz committed heresy.

Coontz, author of “The Way We Never Were” and “Marriage: A History,” spoke last week to a packed hall at Muhlenberg College about how nostalgia for the Good Old Days can skew debates over important issues like the role of government. In doing so she took on the vaunted pioneer times and the 1950s – both eras often cited by presidential candidates as the epitome of what was once good about this country.  

“Pioneer families and 1950s families are in a neck-and-neck tie … for the honor of having received more government help than any families in history,” Coontz said. “Only they received it in the beginning when [they could build upon it], rather than too late when they were already falling off the cliff.”

American pioneers got massive federal land grants, and benefited from government-funded military mobilizations that dispossessed Native Americans and confiscated half of Mexico, she said. Most of the new lands “were sold to settlers at prices way lower than it cost the government to get them,” she said.

The federal government financed the telegraph and the railroad systems needed to open the West, constructed the dams and irrigation projects on which the farm families depended, and later developed the electrification projects of the New Deal – which brought electricity to the sparsely populated rural areas. 

“As for the 1950s, most of the economic growth and the social stability of that decade were due to the incredibly generous government investment in the social mobility of young veterans,” she said. “General GI benefits were available to 40 percent of the male population between the ages of 20 and 24. It picked up not only full tuition [for college] but living expenses. VA programs directly financed 20 percent of the houses.”

The government also paid to build the highways that opened up suburbia to development, providing jobs, she said.

My late father, a veteran of World War II, went to college on the GI Bill and was quick to give it credit for vaulting him from the ranks of the working poor to the middle class.

But some older people tend to forget “how many old people lived in abject deprivation in those good old days when everyone relied on community instead of those – gasp – awful government programs like Social Security,” she said.

Coontz wasn’t saying the pioneers or families in the '50s were sissies, mind you, just that the popular portrait of them as individualists who never accepted a dime of government help is flawed. 

In a future column, I’ll talk more about her insights about memory, nostalgia and the Civil Rights and Women’s movements.

Kutztown Grad September 23, 2011 at 04:30 AM
Just one more person looking for their 15 minutes of fame while spouting absolute garbage..... Of those people who were "given" so much many were, I'm sure, veterans of WWII. They and their families gave their all in sacrifice to serve this country. If the country in turn sent them to college so they could better support their families, I say good for them. As far as the pioneers, they sacrificed also. I wouldn't want to live the life of a pioneer for all the tea in China. Imagine all the hot, dusty days on the trail traveling in a wagon. Then at night they got to sleep on the hard ground, very comfy!! After settling, came back-breaking work to settle the land they got at such a reaonable price per Ms. Coontz. I say they more than earned it with the sweat of their brow. Ms. Coontz should be ashamed.
Margie Peterson September 23, 2011 at 03:02 PM
Ms. Coontz never said the GIs didn't deserve the GI bill or that the pioneer families shouldn't have benefited from government spending on railroads, dams and irrigation systems. I think she'd argue in both cases it was smart public policy. Her point was candidates mythologize those eras as times when Americans didn't need government spending, conveniently forgetting how that spending was key to helping those generations and building this country.
Salisbury Resident September 25, 2011 at 12:22 AM
Very strange...all I can think about when I read this is Jane Fonda.
Carl W September 25, 2011 at 05:49 AM
Off the topic? Great point !! What happened to import duties, designed to keep American jobs & companies strong? NAFTA & CAFTA, brought to us by Charlie Dent & his band of subversives, are there so "Big Business" hierarchy can fire our people & get cheaper labor south of the border, & freely import back to U. S. Thank you, Republicans. (And prices at the pump = prices up, ability to hire down. Charlie, you sweetheart, we don't have jobs, but at least "Big Oil" is rolling in dough [& paying your campaigns])!!!!!!!!!
Carl W September 25, 2011 at 05:52 AM
Carter Lansing 9:58pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011 Um, I think we have much better medical care. We don't institutionalize, sedate and butcher people who have mental illness or disabilities. We are not AS burdened by racist and sexist dogma. And the myth of the "normal" family has been long since laid to rest. So, yeah. I think things are MUCH better than they were in pioneer days or "Happy Days". Thank you, Carter !!!!!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »