Purpose of Pa. Voter I.D. Law "Appears to Be a Sham"

Political analysts say Pa. voter I.D. law potentially disenfranchises hundreds of thousands

Written by G. Terry Madonna & Michael L. Young


What should we think about Pennsylvania’s new voter ID law set to take effect for the 2012 presidential election? The every time they vote.

Enacted this spring, it unleashed a cascade of contention since Governor Tom Corbett signed it in March. It has been hailed, assailed, praised, condemned, defended, attacked, cursed and blessed.

Most Pennsylvanians like it according to polls, although the same polls suggest many don’t understand it well. The law’s goal, to prevent voter fraud, enjoys universal support, yet doubt exists that much fraud actually exists.

Sorting out the facts of Voter ID—many of which we are only now learning—doesn’t paint an encouraging picture.

  • The law’s purpose appears to be a sham.

Its stated objective, to prevent voter fraud, seems to be a classic case of a solution looking for a problem. Evidence of significant voter fraud is virtually nonexistent.

Nationally, not a single person was found guilty of impersonating another voter between 2002 and 2007 (the latest data available). A GOP advocacy group last year did identify 400 fraud prosecutions over the previous decade. Even if true, however, this would still be less than one fraud a year per state.

In Pennsylvania alone, there have been only four fraud convictions over the last eight years, none of which would have been prevented by the new law.

  • The law potentially disenfranchises hundreds of thousands.

Using data recently released by the Corbett administration, some 750,000 Pennsylvanians could be barred from voting by the law.

But legislators voting for the bill in March were told the law would affect as few as one tenth of one percent of voters. The highest estimate was put at 100,000 voters. Putting the kindest construction on it, the March legislation was sloppily prepared before being rushed through the legislature without consideration of its potential impact.

  • The law is politically motivated.

Voter suppression (i.e., discouraging certain groups from voting) is apparently the real motivation of the law. Republicans have frantically denied this, but their own House majority leader publicly acknowledged it last month.

Showing perhaps more candor than canniness, Representative Mike Turzai implied the law had the partisan goal of winning the presidential election for Mitt Romney.

“Voter ID,” proclaimed Turzai, “is going to allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania.” Smoking guns don’t get clearer than that.

  • The law is discriminatory.

It disproportionately hits Democratic voters, notably older, younger, minority and poor voters. However, it also will affect Republican voters statewide.

The GOP stronghold of Cumberland County is estimated to have the largest number of affected voters outside Philadelphia. Cumberland is closely followed by Republican Cameron County.

The stunning high numbers of voters involved evoke sordid memories of voters suppression techniques practiced in the American South in the pre-civil rights era.

  • The law is duplicative.

Almost undiscussed is that Pennsylvania already has a voter ID law in place for first-time voters. It is one that has been neither difficult to implement nor controversial.

Now, by replacing a simple law that works with a convoluted one that won’t, it’s difficult to avoid the conclusion that more sinister motives were at work in passing Voter ID. In fixing what was not broken, the legislature risks breaking what was already fixed.

  • The legislation is untested.

The Corbett administration ran a trial run of Voter ID during the spring 2012 primary, but with few races and low turnout, it provided no real test of what will happen during a close presidential election with high turnout.

We are barely 12 years from the national agony suffered in 2000 in the disputed Bush/Gore election. But that electoral calamity may be mild compared to what these voter ID laws can produce. And counting Pennsylvania, some 30 states may have new voter ID laws on their books by November.

The conclusions are inescapable.

Voter ID was not well thought out, planned or executed. Many legislators voting for it did not know how many people would be affected. In addition, the noxious whiff of voter suppression motives is pervasive. There cannot be a greater crime in a democracy than systematically attempting to prevent eligible voters from exercising the franchise. It’s truly a repulsive act.

What should we do now?

Common sense screams the obvious solution.

We should simply suspend implementation of the new law until an election or two of trial runs shows us how it works and with what effects. Rolling it out in the middle of a presidential contest is sheer folly.

There are many ways to delay implementation. The simplest is for Governor Corbett to declare a moratorium on applying Voter ID until it has been thoroughly studied. The courts can also do it, and many believe they will.

However we do it, the 2012 presidential election is the wrong time to introduce Voter ID to Pennsylvania. In an age of seemingly insoluble problems and endless challenges, this is one we can still avoid.

Robert Sentner October 12, 2013 at 10:40 AM
so let me ask you Dale, as you seem to be the expert. what do these people that do not have ID's do when going to Dr's, obtaining most any kind of cold remedy at Walmart, opening a bank account, renting an Apt., traveling, doing any number of things that the MAJORITY of the legal residents of the United states do. wouldn't it make there life so much easier. We can require everyone in the US to have health care but we can't have everyone have a voter ID card. Ridiculous and I am ashamed of you, the 1,000's of service members that have died so as we can have the right to do just that. this isn't a political thing in my eyes its a safety, common sense issue. Explain to me what is wrong with telling people they have a certain amount of time to obtain this. better yet make it part of the social security process and make it a picture ID. Your king Obama has invaded every aspect of our life why not this one ????
Elsa October 12, 2013 at 11:09 AM
Why is it that I need to show I'd to get a bottle of cough syrup? Because they made it a law How come nobody cares if the non ID folks can't buy cigarettes or cough syrup or beer at wegmans. Only for voting does it matter. We have had a year since the last time to get all these people ID. If they are not smart enough to manage this in a year maybe they should not vote
Jeff Lotte October 12, 2013 at 02:58 PM
Gotta wonder why when the talk was about national IDs for all there wasn't near this much resistance from the Dems, I guess they never thought about the voting part of it, corpses can't apply for a real valid ID. As much as I am opposed to a national ID card, maybe that would be the ultimate solution to many of our problems from voter fraud to illegals. It's not like we have the right to privacy any longer anyway, maybe it is time for EVERYONE to carry proof of who they are too.
Amend October 17, 2013 at 08:25 AM
Voter ID won't stop any voting fraud that may actually be occurring. It's a useless layer of bureaucracy; which is something conservatives are supposedly opposed to. It's nothing more than political shenanigans, like gerrymandering. And a national ID card...really? That's about as unAmerican as it gets. If conservatives are afraid of universal background checks on gun purchases cuz it may lead to a gun registry, how could they ever endorse a BS concept like national ID cards?
Arthur October 17, 2013 at 12:02 PM
I can not understand why any sensible person would be against something that makes sure a person going to the polls to vote is actually someone eligible to vote. If there is a better idea than a valid ID please tell me what it is. Right now I need a photo idea to see my doctor, to drive a car, to enter any government building, to collect welfare and get food stamps, to travel outside the country, to cash a check, to buy booze, etc. It seems that voters do most, if not all of these same things, so what is the big deal about a showing proper ID to vote?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »