Jon,
Agreed. But until they wake up we have the right to carry a sidearm for protection.
As noted, the police shot the dog to stop it.
Tittle or Jesberger could have brought this fight to the same conclusion much sooner and with less damage to Oreo.

We should not allow this fighting-breed dog? The dog did not come out of the womb looking for a fight and to attack dogs like Oreo.

Dogs are extremely loyal creatures -- as evidenced by Oreo refusing to leave his owner's side -- who do what their owners tell them / train them to do.

A human created this mean dog.

The dog's owner should be held responsible, should pay for Oreo's vet bills, and should not be allowed to own any breed of dog ever again.

To Mallory Vough: Dogs aren't natural creatures, that is, they did not evolve naturally, but were created by man for specific purposes. Pit bulls "come out of the womb" genetically wired to attack without warning or provocation (i.e., growling or raising hackles), latch on to their opponent and rip, tear and shake until their victim stops moving. These traits are as much a part of the pit bull as the retriever's inclination to "retrieve" objects or the herding dog's inclination to "herd" animals. While the way a pit bull is raised and trained can alter (to some extent) some of these inbred characteristics, there is no way to remove them.

Most pit bulls that attack humans were raised from puppies, have never been mistreated and are fairly well-trained, yet, when these pit bulls attack, their inbred characteristics surface and someone, or someone's pet or livestock, usually ends up badly injured or dead. Additionally, pit bulls in "attack mode" will attack anything that gets in their way -- their owners, their owner's children, or anything else. Because of their genetic characteristics, pit bulls are six time more likely to attack their owners than other dogs, as evidenced by the high number of owners killed by their pit bulls.

Before you post again, please go to the library, check out some books on dog-breeding and genetics and READ THEM!

Nice generalization, Jon. I suppose you still believe that everyone with the name that starts with Mc drinks heavily and lives in bars all night long? Those with the last name Jones, are lazy and eat fried chicken or that if you have a name with a few vowels you must have bodies in South Philly?

Sorry, it isn't the breed it is the owner. While I feel terrible for these folks and their dog, this article should be about how the owner of this creature allowed the animal to be loose around the neighborhood and terrorizing both humans and animals. These people need to be held accountable.

These victimes need to sue the owner of the animal for the vet bills and pain and suffering. Sadly, their dog may never be the same.

I have two of these "dangerous dogs" as you call them and they lovingly play with the other dogs and my young nieces and nephews.

Read the history of the breed and it shows why these strong, dedicated, beautiful breeds are the way they are.

There are no bad dogs just bad owners.

Awesome comment!

Jon, great comment! However, if the dog was shot by Mr. Tittel or Jesberger hell would have broke loose. There would be protesters throwing daggers at their home for weeks. Needless to say, Jesberger was fighting to release the dog and the pit bull knocked Tittle to the ground. Let me ask, how in the heck did they have time to call the police during this vicious attack? To say the least, a neighbor called the police to report Jesberger for shooting two good dogs. Instead of calling for help, she wanted to press charges against Jesberger for shooting the dogs. LOL what a joke! What an earfull she got when the officer she spoken with was the one who had to shoot this dog. I would expect that now, Jesberger and Tittel will be armed with with mace and a stun gun to protect their dog. Nobody, and I mean Nobody can come to any other conclusion as to what they should have done in this situation unless they have been there and done that.

Ronnie,
Waking up and making a difference with a so called sidearm sounds so masculine and special. Tittel is a Vet and served in Army Recon. Jesberger I am sure carries for her father would insist. What the heck is a so called side arm going to do when when your walking your dog in what is supposed to be a safe park and environment. Gee brings back memories of when the indians were told that they were safe and protected. They were armed but not ready to be slaughtered. Maybe Tittel and Jesberger were armed! Maybe they felt they were fighting a loosing battle when they both fought so hard against a vicious 75 pound pit bull of muscle. You have no right to say would of should of or could of. This was their experience and I am sure this will never leave their memory.

here, here!

Mallory,
Thank you for making the point that it is "the owner who is responsible", not the dog.
Just like it is the owner who is responsible, not the gun.
Maynard,
You should always carry a gun, period. Not just to walk the dog. Consider this...
"As to the species of exercise, I advise the gun. While this gives [only] moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise, and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun, therefore, be the constant companion to your walks."
Thomas Jefferson

Seriously! Perhaps Mr. DelBacco does not realize that Salisbury Township is a suburban community with a high concentration of homes, and streets busy with pedestrians and cars. I would trust NOT ONE of my neighbors to be able to properly defend themselves using a gun while walking our streets. Except the Sheriff who lives down the street.

Absolutely Right! Love your opinion. Unfortunately, the loosers don't get what they deserve. Firearms I believe are essential in this day and age but they are not always appropriate in certain situations. We should have protection but not be so gun hoo about it if you know what I mean. I consider my guns sacred objects to be used only in total desperate situations. I don't pack one on my side waiting for any moment that is threatening to shoot.

I'd love to see where you get your facts from. Please, show me the studies that show that "pit bull owners and breeders, universally, support breeding dog aggressive pit bulls." Universally? Funny because I know lots of law-abiding, kind-hearted citizens who have adopted pit bulls from shelters where they would almost immediately be put down otherwise and raise them with love, care and a gentle hand. They take them out in the public on leashes, in dog parks, etc. where they do nothing but frolic and play with other dogs. I do agree with your statement that "many, many pit bull breeders are deliberately selecting FOR this dangerous trait" and that "dog fighting, and the selling of fighting dogs, is a huge money maker for criminals", but these are not RESPONSIBLE or REPUTABLE or LAW ABIDING breeders. These are usually people involved in drugs, dog fighting and other illegal activities that are catering the others like themselves. If society would make animal abuse, dog fighting and neglect a priority and pass stricter animal abuse laws requiring greater fines and prison time, then perhaps this problem will finally be reduced.

But again, punishing the breed and responsible dog owners for the actions of the stupid, irresponsible owners/breeders is not only immensely unfair but also ineffective.

BTW, my heart too breaks for this grief stricken family. It IS a tragedy that happened--but I want to know where the pit bulls' owner was when it DID happen.

Lisa, everywhere across this country, pit bulls are being bred, neglected, abused and abandoned by the very people who claim to love them...pit owners and breeders. The number of "ethical" breeders of APBT and AmStaffs is so small, it is statistically insignificant. Pit bull owners have the lowest rate of spay and neuter compliance of any other breed, despite numerous programs that offer low cost, even FREE services for them sponsored by humane organizations. Do some research on the types of people advertising pit bull puppies for sale...you will find it almost impossible to find a breeder doing even the minimum genetic health screenings, like OFA...much less breeding only titled dogs, screening prospective owners, selling pets on a s/n contract, etc. Most people breeding pit bulls, if not outright criminals..drug dealers, dog fighters, and gang members.....are simply uneducated kids and losers looking to make a quick buck selling hard looking dogs to their friends in the hood.

There has never been any attempt to breed away from dog aggression in the pit bull, the ADBA celebrates it as an integral part of the breed, the UKC does not consider it a fault, the AKC ignores it. And tell your "kind-hearted" friends that they are grossly irresponsible for taking their pit bulls to dog parks...ALL the breed experts agree that dog aggression is a genetic trait in pit bulls and they DON"T belong in dog parks. I suggest you check out BadRap or Realpitbull.com .

Jon,
It is an area mis-informed and fed lies about guns.

I trust you are presenting that stat in good faith but it's false. The 60% is a cooked number incorporating a wide variety of reported breeds 'similar to pit bulls', and the reported breed of dogs in dog attacks is not reliable anyway, the CDC concluded. Then the 4% is a made up estimate for pure breed American Pit Bull Terriers. Way more than 4% of dogs would be identified as 'pit bulls' if they bit somebody.

Here's the actually relevant statistic: the Humane Society found the 86% of fatal dog attacks on people were by unaltered male dogs, CDC said 90%. CDC found 2/3's of dog attacks on people were by dogs usually chained up outside (a good way to create an aggressive dog). Owner behavior factors dominate.

Also, though owners have to have held responsible for loose dogs which harm other people's dogs, aggression against humans and aggression against other dogs are different dog behaviors, and legislation which invades families to pluck out particular pets which 'look like' some unvfavored breed (be it 'pit bull' or some other that the public gets hysterical about) could not possibly be justified by incidents among dogs. They are a bad solution in any case IMO, but cannot even be rationally contemplated unless the issue is a direct danger to people.

How do you know that they only make up 4% of the dog population? How can anyone know? Not everyone registers their dogs so there is no accurate statement. And pit bull is really a mix of breeds that came to be known as a pit bull. And now, the majority of the dogs in the shelters are listed as pit bull mixes, so did your 4% just go up? I do agree that the owners should be responsible for their dogs actions 100%. I own 2 pit bulls that play with the neighborhood children and all sizes and breeds of dogs in the fields. My dogs get bit a lot by little dogs. Yet they NEVER bite back. I ask the owner to get their little dog under control because it is the aggressive one. Now, if my dog was to retaliate and bite back, it would injure the smaller dog no doubt. So are we saying that my dogs should be punished and not allowed to play with all the other dogs because that little one wants to start trouble? As a smart pit bull owner, I will NOT take my dogs to the dog park because I do fear another dog will start with my dog and my dog has the power to hurt the smaller ones. Then my dog gets labeled as aggressive while the little yappy dog is the victim. Pathetic yet so true. So I stick to my neighborhood where they all know my dogs and no one fears them because they took time to not judge and saw they are better dogs than their own.

Thank you for acknowledging this :)

I find it amusing that you talk about media conspiracies and then provide a link to a ridiculously biased website. Wow.

It's biased because it's singling out a breed. What about Rottweilers? What about Huskies? What about German Shephards? What about Dalmatians? What about the Chow Chows?

Why doesn't "Occupy Maul Street" include any other breeds? Because it's biased.

It bothers Mallory not one bit to see how many victims of pit bulls require flight for life helicopter rides. How much devastation pit bulls actually do. Wow.

It bothers me how no other breed of dog is listed on this site as well. It bothers me that irresponsible people train their dogs to be this way to cause injury. It bothers me that the breed gets labeled. I find that smaller dogs are pretty aggressive but I guess because they only give you 7 stitches it is okay. It's okay that my brother's nose has a huge scar on it from getting bit in the face by a hairless chihuahua. no worries there!

Well, I worked in Animal Law and with AKC Animal Law- 1st of all Pit Bull is not a specific Breed..The definition is any dog used in Pit Fighting...In most cases they are breed mixed and deriving of a Mastiff breeds- Staffordshire Bull Terrier Breed, Cane Corso, Presa Cario (a/k/a Cane Presario) and the Dogo Argentino- for the most part these dogs are very nurturing and family oriented dogs- that are big family protectors...Mixes of these breeds and sometimes purebreds have been now all called "Pit Bulls"- due to the pit fighting- it is a term people have come to know and any dog looking like this is now known as a Pit Bull. Many of these like the Cane Corso, Cane Presario, and the Dogo Argintino are very docile dogs- great around friends and family and other pets- like cats- which would be small prey to many other breeds. This whole issue on Pit Bulls is due to bad owners using them for fighting or training them to do this, and uneducated people.. It is just a term that all dogs looking like this get...Really sad they get a bad rap for something humans have trained them to do...And many of the ones that are very aggressive- are bred that way- by over breeding certain dogs w/ certain characteristics....There are many books and links out there- if anyone cares to research this - it is not just opion- it is genetics/over breeding and human misconception/ignorance.

That is very true Kaos. I mentioned a little bit about that in my post at the bottom of the page eaerlier this morning and asked people to research inbreeding. I also mentioned to sheriffchris that a pit bull is not really a breed but a mix of breeds so he should probably change his statistics and get real facts. As well as educate himself a little more. But he probably won't and that is a shame. I am not blind to the damage that pit bulls are capable of, but I am also not blind to the damage a lot of dogs and humans can do. Unfortunately, guys like him have tunnel vision.

Athena- This misconception of PitBull being a breed is enforced through media and insurance companies...Too funny - if you are not allowed to have a PitBull for Home Owners Insurance purposes- you can put down the true breed of your dog, if you know it- for instance, Staffordshire Bull Terrier- and these companies do not put 2 and 2 together...It is lack of education, and then you do have these Breeders- calling their dogs "Blue PitBulls" or whatever their name of their champion sire or "bitch" is- I have seen a ton...It is these people creating a Breed Name, because they have been breeding their mixed "Pit Bull" to create their own market. It is just like these Designer Mutts that go for crazy amounts of money..They are a mixed breed- that is now in high demand...I have a Huskita- a husky/akita hybrid, but in 20yrs- this will be considered a new breed bcs it is now called a Huskita.. Or Labradoodle's, there are a ton more.. Genetically speaking because there is a mix in the gene pool- these mixed breed mutts are usually less agressive- due to the breeding pool being so much bigger...But breeding a champion fighter PitBull to another Champion Fighter PitBull- you are seriously decreasing the gene pool- because you are not mixxing a breed, but mixxing 2 titled dogs- over and over again..

You can see these dogs for sale all over the place - I won't mention the names, because- it is like a show dog name and I don't want to defame anyone..In anycase so you have "Joe's" Blue Bully dogs for sale- and champion "Jill's" Red Nose Pit Bull mix- these are not separete breeds obviously- but people who are into "PitBull's" for other reasons- will think that is a great mix- and then the shorter lineage of these 2 dogs will be bred over and over....This is another big cause of Agression in these dogs..creating a very small gene pool...The breeders of these dogs are helping to create the bad rap for these dogs... Because of the way they are advertising it and selling their dogs to make money.. I don't think people realize as to how these dogs got the "Champion" title- since this is not a AKC or any Recognized Breed-when they want to purchase one..Or if they do- they are buying it for purposes that may be abusive or illegal- at least in most cases..

Funny. I am a high school counselor always putting others before me. Always helping the community that I both work for and live in. I own a house, I own a car, I have excellent credit, I don't do drugs, I don't drink but maybe at a social gathering once a month, and I own 2 loving pit bulls. I am slightly confused by your comment. I'm both sorry that you feel this way and feel sorry for you that you feel this way about all the people that own pit bulls. Even with your biased thinking and dicrimination against someone like myself, I would still go out of my way to provide assistance for you if you needed it. And expect nothing in return. And then you could turn around and call me a selfish and dificient personality and gang banger (funny) and I would still help you the next time. So maybe that just makes me stupid, but not really the other things you labeled me as a proud pit bull owner
:)

Glad he is doing better, I understand your ordeal completely. Hope he makes a full recovery!

Tammie,
So sorry you had to go through this ordeal. "Rotting in Hell" is a bit over the top though in my opinion. Have they police been able to identify the owners and the circumstances that led to these two dogs getting loose?
I too am an animal lover. We have a cat and dog as well. However, they're like my kids and if they were being mauled by another animal I would discharge my sidearm to dispatch the animal. Critics be damned, if it were a member of their family I hope they'd do whatever they could to save them.
You are courageous and brave. It is stories like yours that confirm my decision to legally carry a gun is in fact the right choice for me.
I wish you a speedy recovery, "and your little dog too" :)

Just glad you, your wife, and Oreo are on the mend. I say outlaw pit bulls . They are just too vicious!

I am very glad to hear that Oreo is doing well. Sounds like he is a trooper and wonderful pet.. I hope you nail the owners of the pit bull that was the cause of this ordeal. I really hope that your county Dog Warden and Humane Officer are involved, as well- not only your local police...Who knows what else is happening in the house that this dog lived in- that caused him to feel the need to be out for blood with your little Oreo.- I agree it can be personality, however, it is still the pet owner's responsibility to be in control of his/her dog. No matter what, they are held liable for their pet's behavior. I hope you get an attorney and go after them in a civil suit, as well, for Oreo's vet bills and any trauma (physical and mental) you and your family have gone through in this ordeal. The animal laws in PA are here, but they most certainly are not strict enough- but the key is, they have to be enforced. Good Luck.

Pennsylvania Dog Laws: http://www.animallaw.info/statutes/stuspa3ps459_502.htm
"Summary: These statutes represent Pennsylvania's Dog Law,... the dangerous dog chapter. The significant features of the law include a statewide control requirement for dogs (Section 305) and provisions for "dangerous dogs" (Section 501 et. seq.). Under the latter, any person may kill any dog which he sees in the act of pursuing or wounding or killing any domestic animal, including household pets, or pursuing, wounding or attacking human beings, whether or not such a dog bears a required license tag. There is no liability on such persons in damages or otherwise for such killing. Any person who has been attacked by a dog(s) may file a complaint to have the dog registered as "dangerous." Not only is a crime in the Commonwealth to harbor a dangerous dog, but an owner must post a surety bond for $50,000 (can be an insurance policy) and the dog must be proper enclosed unless muzzled and restrained by a substantial chain or leash while under physical restraint of a responsible person. The article does not apply if the threat, injury or damage was sustained by a person who, at the time, was committing a willful trespass or other tort upon the premises occupied by the owner of the dog, or was tormenting, abusing or assaulting the dog or has, in the past, been observed or reported to have tormented, abused or assaulted the dog, or was committing or attempting to commit a crime. "

www.AnimalLaw.Info is a website strictly on statutes/law -not opinion...If you have any questions about actual animal laws, in any state, it will be on this website...It is a very useful tool....Below is another website pertaining to animal law and legalities of pet owner liabilities.
***** Dog Owner Liability and Laws *******
http://personal-injury.lawyers.com/dog-bites/Liability-of-Dog-Owners.html ******
http://personal-injury.lawyers.com/dog-bites/When-Your-Pet-Attacks-Are-You-Liable.html ***** Both these webpages can give you information or anyone one else interested in knowing their responsibilities and the law when it comes to pet...If need be, you can also find Legal Representation/Attorney's on this site...Each city,state, Twp, Boro has their own regulations on "Dangerous Breeds" (not just pit bulls) and "One Bite" laws- some stricter than others..It may help you to look into the statutes in your area to know what owners of the attacking pit bull have violated.

I agree Tammie. The owner is the one fully responsible because the owner is the one that took on the ownership of these dogs and is responsible for them. I believe that the owner should be responsible for all losses that you have suffered, both monetary and emotional losses. I think your comment was very honest. There is no reason those dogs should have been loose and without supervision.I am glad your Oreo is doing better as well as your father. I am also saddened that 2 dogs may have to pay the ultimate price because they didn't have responsible owners. And if the dogs are trained yet still have an aggressive personality, then more reason that the owners should NEVER allow those dogs to be unattended and loose. I hope you get compensated. I really really do because that vet bill should not be another stressor, nor the fear of walking your dog. And hopefully the owner won't be getting another dog anytime soon.... if at all.

That is what ALL pit bull owners say after their dog attacks. When did people start getting so confident with dangerous animals? This is called lion tamer complex. Google all the pit attacks where they was completely unprovoked, the dog was always good, never no signs of aggression. You are nothing special, you all think you are which is part of the sociopathic personalities of pit owners but you are not. Your beats is just as liable to attack you as it is a small dog or small child.

Mike,
Of course carrying a gun will not solve all our problems. However, against a threat stronger, bigger, and more vicious, it can be the needed equalizer to save one's life. Carrying a gun has nothing to do with insecurity and everything to do with preparedness. For your information, I also carry a small flashlight, bandana, cell phone, ID, inhaler, pocket knife, and a small sharpie. Each can be used for several different applications. General preparedness is something I learned and took seriously since Cub Scouts. A lot of that has carried over into my adult life. I'll bet if you were to ask around you'd find many who also have some sort of routine preparedness they have made a part of their daily lives.
To your other point, "agreed" that the owner is responsible, but while the fight is in progress the noise of a gun might have ended it by scaring away the dogs or the bullet itself could have ended it permanently and prevented other possible attacks.
From the description in the story, Jesberger was certainly close enough to the Pit Bull's head to deliver a well placed shot.

Ronnie- I see what you are getting at, however, I have been involved in large breed dog fights..Where it had nothing to do with training, but puberty and the Alpha Male role in a 3yr old Akita that I had since he was 7mo w/ my other male dogs (a pit bull and a Siberian Husky)...They were great together, the Akita turned 3yrs old and out of no where decided he was going to be the Alpha and could be around no other male dogs..The Akita weighing in at 180lbs was being hit with a Police Officer's Emergency Shovel- this did not even phase the dog..In fact, he turned around and licked the officer a couple of times, then commenced to whipping my other dogs around like ragdolls. Mind you this officer was built like a "brick sh*t house" and well over 6ft tall and he could not pull this dog away... I also had in a separate attempt used a hose, a horn, can of quarters, a b.b.gun (for the noise- not to shoot the dog)- to no avail...When a dog is out for blood- there is almost nothing that can be done- unless by the miracle that you can pry them off and be lucky enough to not get bit. Shooting a gun in the air, in most cases- will either agitate the dog more or do nothing at all. I know in my situation, after a lot of heart ache- we could not even get our vet to put the dog down (as is what our animal control officer wanted done) because he was not human aggressive at all- an absolute baby- Just did not like other male dogs...He is now a guard dog in a wood mill, as a sole dog.

I can understand that in some situations where a gun or a trank is the only way to solve this issue...I am an absolute animal lover and big animal advocate..However, when an animal is aggressive and in a situation where there are no immediate options, then yes, shooting or tranking the dog is the only way. If the dog is same sex or just dog aggressive (not human aggressive) then the owners need to be responsible for the situation..I have a 6ft fence due to my Huskita turning 5yrs old and is now not fond of male dogs- yes it was expensive, but it is my responsibility as a pet owner to know that any other male dog in the area is OK and safe to be outside..My dog is very well trained, but some other dogs are not..I have a fence for my dog's safety as well as anyone else's in the area. My dog is well over 100lbs and I have seen him kill 35lb ground hogs with one bite and a shake..I am not willing to take the chance of him getting into it with another pet- whether he is defending himself or him being the aggressor. I have no doubt that he would seriously injure or kill another animal if he was even just protecting himself from another animal.. It is all about responsible pet ownership and training. I know that I would be held accountable, it is a shame that too many people get dogs and have no idea or care about the responsibilities that come with having a pet. These people need to be held accountable.

KayOss, here's a phrase you should learn...to belittle is to BE LITTLE!

Mike,
Calling Animal Control or the Plice is a great idea if one sees an aggressive dog in their neighborhood. It should be done, and the person seeing it should go a different way immediately. I don't even walk my Beagle anywhere but on the canal path. She's VERY friendly, but just as protective and she frightens people without meaning too. So to avoid any possible problems I just let her run around the fenced in yard. I have been fortunate that when I did walk her every other dog was also on a leash. She's only 21 pounds, but she gets very aggressive (protective) of us.
On the issue of guns: My decision to carry a gun is not just for dog walking. I carry everywhere I'm legally permitted to do so. Here in Easton you may know our mayor's favorite campaign slogan is "Cleaner and Safer". Joking aside, it is anything but. I haven't always felt this way, but over the past several years It has gotten worse. General preparedness is a daily theme I live by and try to teach my girls. I am responsible for their protection until they are grown and gone. We don't have police protection. That job is mine as a husband and father.

Mike, I didn't ask...that was Jon. Easton is a much different place than Salisbury.

assinine opinions? You obviously did not even read my posts. Only once I asked what type of area is this on the comments above about people saying no one should pack guns. You are too quick to find a confrontation. All my comments was on the pit bull issue besides one in where I said, and I quote "Get real people, there is nothing wrong with having a gun to protect yourself. What kind of area is this?" IN reply to the anti gun comments above.

Athena while I agree with your comments about pitbulls- I do not agree with the Show Dog comments...I worked AKC Dog law- these people have nothing better to do then to spend money on these animals- and there is a ton of money spent on genetic/DNA testing to verify lineage of the animal- it is safe to assume that somewhere in their history they may have a link- but it is pretty far back the lineage. The facts are- that yes, these show dogs have the spot light, more and more people want the breed- so there is a ton of breeding to produce the demand of the public- that want the dog as a pet..This is where the sever overbreeding is happening...You can get AKC paperwork for a Pet Quality dog- but there is a reason it is being sold as a pet and not going into the show ring- it is not Show Quality.. This is where you breeders come in and have 1 or 2 registered show winners and then overbreed or the Puppy mills have 2 AKC Registered animals- and start a breeding business. But the AKC Show world is very cut throat and Breeding that close in the lineage would end a breeders career. While I am not personally a fan of people breeding dogs and then selling them for a ton of money, because of a peice of paper and who their parents may have been- these are not even show quality dogs- but people want AKC paperwork for a pet quality dog- no reason for it- there are a ton of animals out there that need homes, that is why I do rescue.

We got another Vet tech! ha ha ha http://maultalk.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/im-a-vet-tech/

" Any person who claims to be a “vet tech” when talking about the pit bull issue should quickly be dismissed as a fraud."

ALWAYS a pit bull owner claiming to be a vet tech or pro dog trainer in every single mauling thread I have ever seen and it is ALWAYS in reference to how they are a vet tech seeing many other dogs that bite more and ALWAYS bring up chihuahuas and ALWAYS say pit bulls are the most well behaved.

lol cant you nuts come up with any new material? Really, you are embarrassing yourself.